Role Of Positive Psychology At Workplace In Managing Occupational Stress In Professional Educational Intuitions

Abstract

Purpose: Occupational stress is a significant challenge among professionals in higher education, affecting their psychological health, occupational performance, and largely quality of work life. This study investigates the role of positive psychology in managing occupational stress within professional educational institutions. By incorporating key principles such as resilience, mindfulness, strengths-based leadership, and workplace well-being programs, positive psychology offers an effective framework for stress mitigation.

Design/Methodology/ Approach: The study was conducted among 302 respondents and employs a mixed-method approach, integrating quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to assess the impact of positive psychological interventions on stress reduction and job satisfaction among faculty members in both “public and private institutions”. Statistical analysis, including regression modeling and Pearson’s Correlation is conducted to examine the association between positive psychological construct such as “optimism”, emotional intelligence, and “self-efficacy” and occupational stress.

Findings: The findings reveal that institutions embracing positive psychology experience lower stress levels, enhanced mental well-being, and increased professional engagement among educators.

Research Implications: This study highlights the role of positive psychology in reducing occupational stress among higher education faculty.

Practical Implications: It guides policymakers in implementing well-being initiatives and mental health programs.

Social Implications: The findings enrich workplace stress research and support institutional leaders in development a healthier and extra productive work atmosphere.

Originality/value: It offers empirical evidence on the effectiveness of resilience, mindfulness, and well-being initiatives in academic workplaces. By comparing public and private institutions, the research fills a gap in understanding sectoral differences in stress management.