Startups Without Founders: How Daos Redefine Entrepreneurship—A Systematic Review And Process Model For Decentralized Innovation

Abstract

What happens to innovation when the founder never shows up? This study reframes one of the most romanticized elements of entrepreneurship—the visionary founder—as a potential bottleneck to resilience, accountability, and governance in digital-native organizations. Focusing on Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), we explore how startups can operate without a central leader, and what that means for the future of organizational design.

Using a structured literature synthesis (n = 127 articles, PRISMA protocol) and multi-case comparative analysis of prominent DAO failures, we identify systemic governance vulnerabilities—ranging from role confusion and voting fatigue to social trust collapses. In response, we propose the Conflict-Proof DAO Model, a three-phase circular governance framework built around pre-crisis safeguards, active crisis protocols, and post-crisis institutionalization. Unlike prior models, this framework does not assume stability as the default—it assumes conflict. And it treats governance not as a bureaucratic add-on, but as a core infrastructure layer in founderless systems.

Our findings suggest that resilience in decentralized startups is not a byproduct of automation or community goodwill, but a direct outcome of intentional design. This paper contributes to the emerging discourse on post-founder entrepreneurship, governance-as-code, and antifragile organizational models. For researchers, it offers a replicable framework for analyzing DAO failure patterns. For builders and policymakers, it presents a roadmap for surviving disruption—without waiting for a hero to fix things.