Nutritional Value Study Of Some Spontaneous Species From Saharan Rangelands: Case Of The Ouargla Region, Algeria

Authors

  • Mahma Hassen, Zouaoui Ahmed , Chehma Abdelmadjid, Et Benrima Atika Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64252/74jecw58

Keywords:

Saharan rangelands, canopy cover, abundance-dominance, nutritional value.

Abstract

Rangelands in Saharan regions are characterized by high geomorphological heterogeneity, which induces a specific floristic diversity for each ecosystem, associated with a highly significant difference in species density (p < 0.001). This spatio-temporal complementarity provides herders with opportunities for selective transhumance to meet livestock requirements throughout the four seasons of the year. In the present study, a floristic characterization of several rangeland types was carried out, and the nutritional value of their main spontaneous species was evaluated.The results revealed that the rangeland type exerts a highly significant effect on vegetation canopy cover (p < 0.001). Within the "wadi beds" rangeland, Limoniastrum guyonianum displayed the highest cover (17.4 m3), while the lowest was recorded for Salicornia strobilacea(0.003 m3). Across all studied rangelands, the vegetation structure remained scattered, with an abundance-dominance index not exceeding a value of 2.Regarding the nutritional evaluation, deep interspecific contrasts were highlighted. The highest energy values were recorded for Salicornia strobilacea (0.86 UFL and 0.81 UFV / kg DM), whereas the lowest were attributed to Stipagrostis pungens(0.38 UFL and 0.35 UFV kg DM). In terms of nitrogen value, Malcolmia aegyptiaca exhibited the highest contents (91 g PDIE and 82g PDIN / kg DM), while Stipagrostis pungens showed the lowest value (49 g PDIE and 26 g PDIN / kg DM).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nutritional Value Study Of Some Spontaneous Species From Saharan Rangelands: Case Of The Ouargla Region, Algeria. (2026). International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 812-822. https://doi.org/10.64252/74jecw58