"Evaluation of the Effect of a Combination of Zinc, Fructose, And Pumpkin Seeds on Sperm Count in Male Wistar Rats."

Authors

  • Anjali Goswami Author
  • Sonalika Singh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64252/xp5dqy10

Keywords:

Zinc, Fructose, Pumpkin seeds, Male fertility, Sperm count, Antioxidants, Wistar rats.

Abstract

Male infertility is a major global health concern, with low sperm count and poor semen quality being key contributors. This study investigated the effects of a combined supplementation of zinc, fructose, and pumpkin seeds on reproductive and systemic health in male Wistar rats. Twenty-four rats were divided into four groups: control, 100 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg, and 200 mg/kg, treated orally for eight weeks. Reproductive parameters, hormonal profiles, and histopathology of major organs were assessed. The 100 mg/kg group showed improved semen quality and enhanced germ cell development, while the 150 mg/kg group demonstrated the most optimal outcomes, including increased sperm count (100–118 million/mL), motility (76–84%), viability (86–92%), balanced gonadotropins, and preserved organ histology with vigorous spermatogenesis. The 200 mg/kg group exhibited the highest semen parameters (120–122 million/mL count, 88–92% motility) but developed severe multi-organ toxicity including renal, cardiac, pancreatic, and testicular degeneration. Overall, supplementation at moderate doses (100–150 mg/kg) enhanced reproductive potential, with 150 mg/kg identified as the safest and most effective therapeutic dose, while supraphysiologic dosing (200 mg/kg) induced systemic toxicity. These findings highlight the potential of zinc, fructose, and pumpkin seeds as synergistic agents in improving male fertility, warranting further investigation for clinical translation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

"Evaluation of the Effect of a Combination of Zinc, Fructose, And Pumpkin Seeds on Sperm Count in Male Wistar Rats." . (2024). International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 170-182. https://doi.org/10.64252/xp5dqy10