Critical Discourse Analysis Of Ideological Interdiscursivity In Selected Artificial Intelligence English Extracts

Abstract

The study employs Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to analyze how technological discourses are influenced by AI-generate d English texts. The research marries Fairclough’s three-dimensional discourse analysis, Van Dijk’s socio-cognitive approach, and Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) in the use of mixed-methods research, integrating primarily qualitative analysis with quantitative corpus-based data, to perform a thorough analysis of twenty AI-produced English texts. The findings identify the sophisticated linguistic mechanisms through which AI language employs modality, nominalization, passive voice, and interdiscursive blending to normalize and legitimize dominant contemporary ideologies. These mechanisms serve to legitimize technocracy, individualize responsibility, and obscure the complex socio-political forces involved in operating AI systems, all under the cover of seemingly neutral and moralized language. Specifically, the research demonstrates how passives and abstractions habitually cover over agency, and moral adjectives such as "fairness" and "inclusion" get redefined in technical registers, thereby staking claim to objective moral argumentation.This paper is an enriching contribution to the yet-emergent literature of the ethics of AI discourse because it de-mystifies the very basic function of language in the construction of society's attitude and understanding of technological change. It dissolves the idea of objective language generated by AI and theorizes it as performative discursive power, which speaks, negotiates, and legitimates relations of power and ideological formation. The paper concludes on the basis of advocating the incorporation of critical digital literacy in education courses and on the basis of advocating increased inter-disciplinarity towards more reflexive and ethically responsible involvement with AI technologies in academe as well as in practice.