Knowledge and Attitudes of Patients, MBBS Students, Nurses, and Technicians Toward Preoperative and Postoperative Instructions in Elective Surgeries

Authors

  • Amol Ranjan, Dr. Prakash Gattu, Hemang Runthla, Sanya Tiwari, Sunidhi, Akriti Shukla, Aryan Jeswani, Dr. Hemant Kumar Garg, Dr. Col Brij Mohan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64252/f0ygw990

Keywords:

Knowledge, Attitude, Patients, MBBS students, Nurses, Technicians, Preoperative instructions, Postoperative instructions, Elective surgeries

Abstract

Background: Effective preoperative and postoperative instructions are critical for optimal surgical outcomes. However, the level of understanding and attitudes toward these instructions may vary across stakeholders involved in elective surgeries. Objective: To assess and compare the knowledge and attitudes of operated patients, MBBS students, nurses, and technicians regarding preoperative and postoperative instructions in elective surgeries. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 200 participants: 50 operated patients from various departments, 50 MBBS students, 50 nurses, and 50 technicians. A structured Likert-scale questionnaire was used to assess knowledge and attitudes. Results: Nurses demonstrated the highest knowledge scores (mean = 82.4%), followed by MBBS students (78.6%), technicians (65.2%), and patients (58.9%). Positive attitudes were highest among nurses and students, while patients showed moderate compliance and understanding. Conclusion: While healthcare professionals showed satisfactory knowledge and attitudes, gaps remain among patients and technicians. Targeted educational interventions are recommended to improve surgical literacy and compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Knowledge and Attitudes of Patients, MBBS Students, Nurses, and Technicians Toward Preoperative and Postoperative Instructions in Elective Surgeries. (2025). International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2680-2684. https://doi.org/10.64252/f0ygw990